Ubiquitous Domain Knowledge
In the professional world of today, each one of us, or
nearly everyone works in some industry or service context. All of us, working
in our respective industries, may contribute directly to the industry through
sales, product / Service Innovation or delivery or Indirectly through support
functions like HR, IT, Legal, Finance, Operations etc.. The domains here would
not just be industry but also include Government and its many functions.. Or
even arts and entertainment like Bollywood and its mechanizations to get
successful movies done. Or Even some deep technology service domains like
Big-Data, Computing, Telecommunications etc.
It is imperative that knowledge of that industry and
its nuances become critical for you to establish yourself and grow to senior
positions of influence. This is Regardless whether you are directly or
indirectly involved with the industry / Service Eco-system
For people Indirectly
involved like IT HR and Finance, there is a constant questioning whether
one understands the domain that they are working in, do the appreciate the
intrinsic challenges, customer value and therefore align their work and
solutions that they offer. This translates to conversations and evaluations
during ones career life-time over how well you have imbibed and do understand
the domain.
This domain knowledge typically touted as strengths by
business analysts {esp in IT Services, a space that I belong to } are today so
ubiquitously touted by everyone. That this dispersion of claims, where we hear
people rachet out experiences in wide ranging industries from Tech, to
financial services to healthcare etc.. Myself being one such claimant on
Insurance, Pharmaceuticals Manufacturing, high- Tech and IT Services. This got
me thinking as to what is domain knowledge and when / how can a person truly be
considered as a domain expert?
GVP's Pearl of wisdom
It reminded me of a wonderful interaction with the CEO
of a Indian
Pharma Major Dr Reddys [DRL] many years ago. I was then quite fresh
in the industry and had just joined DRL and had gone through an induction
program and a few weeks of exposure to the various aspects of the pharma value
chain [ mostly backend as we would not have the market customer facing
experience ... being located ourselves in Hyderabad in india, while a large
part of the markets where elsewhere in india and abroad in foreign locations ].
This interaction with the leadership was the culmination of our induction
process and a leadership get together was due before all of us got down to
brass-tacks of daily chores that awaited our role. It was arranged in one of
the corporate auditoriums typical theater like setup with steeped arches of
swinging chairs facing a staged floor in front of us at the bottom where the
leadership were seated and would soon address us. During this event, we eagerly
looked forward to meeting the CEO Mr GV Prasad well known in the industry
circles and within DRL for his aggression, innovation and management alacrity.
The gathering was large, other than a few of us laterals, there were a myriad
graduates from various colleges relevant to Pharma business including
under-grads post grads from medical , medical sales, engineering and a few
management graduates all gathered. During this interaction what I vividly
remember and would like to recall in the context of domain ensued during GVP''s
address to the graduating class.
In his speech, GVP [ as he was called] asked us how good was
the induction and how much do we think we now understand pharmaceuticals
business. This was a pertinent question as many of us had joined as relative
pharma novices without background to this industry, and it looked like he was
tryiing to gauge how much we had gained from the program. We could hear various
responses, people shouting out 70%, 60% and other numbers and such equivalents
to show that the program had successfully given a a good perspective on Pharma.
All through this GVP smiled in his typical manner looking at all of us. Finally
after the responses were through, GVP stated his experience in Pharma, going
all the way back to the early 1980s as part of his business Cheminor Drug and
then DRL cumulating about ~20 years of work leading these organizations
and he said that he could hazard that he
has gathered just about 5% knowledge of the industry. Revealing so, GVP
concluded, that we all should embrace humility and work hard long-term before
we truly claim expertise. That was a total eye opener and stunned the gathering
to a few moments of silence. I am not sure whether GVP did this regularly for
an effect, as part of his interaction or was that spontaneous but that left a
deep impression.
Today when I look at all types of people esp from support
functions walking around claiming domain expertise and drawing flow charts to
prove their claims, I wonder what is true domain expertise. This thought has
been in mind for a few years and therefore this attempt and giving a Structure
[ akin to the CMM!! ] on what is domain expertise. Under some special moments
of clarity, it started to strike me that one could visualize domain expertise
like concentric regions [ think chakra-vyuha for
visual simile] moving closer to the center of each industries domain where,
people reside and that reflect their depth of true understanding of domain
I propose this Chakra-View [ !! ~ Vyuh] to benchmark
myself and view others as well. I propose 4 layers, like regions in a circular
ocean, the outer most being shallow and the innermost deepest with most water
and hidden treasures or secrets .. Most people are found to be in the outer
most layer adjoining land. Here as expected most people are to be seen and to
be claiming that they are now comfortable with the waters of the ocean and
therefore marine experts!
The 4 regions and the related 4 personas being as shown
in the graphic below
Layer of Expertise
|
Persona
|
Index
|
%-age
|
Brief Description
|
Communication / Vocabulary
|
Jargonist
|
1%
|
90%~
|
Knows definitions
terminology. Shallow outer knowledge,
junior assistant, or support function personnnel
|
Customs / Practices
|
Machinist
|
10%
|
9%~
|
Knows to execute
transactions, process. In Training within industry in lean, these are the
operators, can do but don’t exactly know why.
|
Context
|
Cognist
|
50%
|
.9%~
|
Knows the context
in which the industry plays, How the market place delivers value to the end
customers, Nuances of competition and their relative positions.
|
Connects
|
Protagonist
|
100%
|
.1%~
|
Knows and has the
connects with key people who are getting things done and has information on
future state of the industry before the industry gets there. They are the
people who shape the industry into the future
|
In Part II, I will attempt a detailed perspective on each of
these above layers of expertise and persona. I would like to get your thoughts
on how you view Domain expertise.
Comments
Post a Comment